<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Supreme Court raises middle finger to middle america</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.takingaim.co.uk/us-supreme-court-raises-middle-finger-to-middle-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.takingaim.co.uk/us-supreme-court-raises-middle-finger-to-middle-america/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:33:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. Froward</title>
		<link>http://www.takingaim.co.uk/us-supreme-court-raises-middle-finger-to-middle-america/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>P. Froward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.takingaim.co.uk/?p=199#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>Well, Scalia seems not to think that the gesture he made is obscene, which I think would make a difference between thoughtlessness and genuine swinishness.

It was a mistake either way, &quot;for reasons which must now be all too obvious&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Scalia seems not to think that the gesture he made is obscene, which I think would make a difference between thoughtlessness and genuine swinishness.</p>
<p>It was a mistake either way, &#8220;for reasons which must now be all too obvious&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.takingaim.co.uk/us-supreme-court-raises-middle-finger-to-middle-america/comment-page-1/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.takingaim.co.uk/?p=199#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing that out.

I&#039;m not an expert on the etiquette of insulting and dismissive gestures, but I would have thought that both the (individually) raised middle finger, and the  brushing the fingers against the chin gesture, are both pretty offensive to make in a Church.

Is there a reason why one should be seen as less offensive than the other?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing that out.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not an expert on the etiquette of insulting and dismissive gestures, but I would have thought that both the (individually) raised middle finger, and the  brushing the fingers against the chin gesture, are both pretty offensive to make in a Church.</p>
<p>Is there a reason why one should be seen as less offensive than the other?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. Froward</title>
		<link>http://www.takingaim.co.uk/us-supreme-court-raises-middle-finger-to-middle-america/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>P. Froward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.takingaim.co.uk/?p=199#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>Well, actually, the middle finger &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; used in that gesture, along with the rest, so it&#039;s obviously not correct to say &quot;there wasn&#039;t any middle finger&quot;. &quot;Not that &lt;em&gt;gesture&lt;/em&gt;&quot;, is what I was aiming at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, actually, the middle finger <em>is</em> used in that gesture, along with the rest, so it&#8217;s obviously not correct to say &#8220;there wasn&#8217;t any middle finger&#8221;. &#8220;Not that <em>gesture</em>&#8220;, is what I was aiming at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. Froward</title>
		<link>http://www.takingaim.co.uk/us-supreme-court-raises-middle-finger-to-middle-america/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>P. Froward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.takingaim.co.uk/?p=199#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>There wasn&#039;t any middle finger, apparently. He &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2006/03/27/justice_scalia_gives_a_sign_but_no_finger_in_boston/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;brushed his fingers under his chin&lt;/a&gt;, which is supposedly a Sicilian gesture meaning &quot;don&#039;t bother me&quot;. Which, okay, whatever. I&#039;d&#039;ve preferred the middle finger myself, but that inference doesn&#039;t appear to be accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There wasn&#8217;t any middle finger, apparently. He <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2006/03/27/justice_scalia_gives_a_sign_but_no_finger_in_boston/" rel="nofollow">brushed his fingers under his chin</a>, which is supposedly a Sicilian gesture meaning &#8220;don&#8217;t bother me&#8221;. Which, okay, whatever. I&#8217;d've preferred the middle finger myself, but that inference doesn&#8217;t appear to be accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.takingaim.co.uk/us-supreme-court-raises-middle-finger-to-middle-america/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 06:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.takingaim.co.uk/?p=199#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>Oops.  Thanks Thomas.  Too much late night posting, too little brainpower and research skills applied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.  Thanks Thomas.  Too much late night posting, too little brainpower and research skills applied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Wicker</title>
		<link>http://www.takingaim.co.uk/us-supreme-court-raises-middle-finger-to-middle-america/comment-page-1/#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Wicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.takingaim.co.uk/?p=199#comment-1082</guid>
		<description>Quick aside: Bush&#039;s recent appointee was Justice Samuel Alito, not Antonin Scalia (see http://www.supremecourtus.gov/about/members.pdf for a list of the members). Scalia was appointed by Reagan back in &#039;86. That&#039;s how come Bush said, in his election campaign of &#039;00, that he wanted more Scalias on the court (which Americablog is referring to when it mentions that Scalia is Bush&#039;s favorite).

So, love &#039;im all you like (I don&#039;t; I think he&#039;s dead wrong about virtually everything), but he ain&#039;t even a Bush I appointee.

(fyi, Bush I appointed Justices David Souter and Clarence Thomas, and Bush II appointed Chief Justice John Roberts in addition to Justice Alito)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick aside: Bush&#8217;s recent appointee was Justice Samuel Alito, not Antonin Scalia (see <a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/about/members.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.supremecourtus.gov/about/members.pdf</a> for a list of the members). Scalia was appointed by Reagan back in &#8217;86. That&#8217;s how come Bush said, in his election campaign of &#8217;00, that he wanted more Scalias on the court (which Americablog is referring to when it mentions that Scalia is Bush&#8217;s favorite).</p>
<p>So, love &#8216;im all you like (I don&#8217;t; I think he&#8217;s dead wrong about virtually everything), but he ain&#8217;t even a Bush I appointee.</p>
<p>(fyi, Bush I appointed Justices David Souter and Clarence Thomas, and Bush II appointed Chief Justice John Roberts in addition to Justice Alito)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
